Blood glucose control, and specifically how steady your blood glucose levels are after eating, is an important indicator of health. According to a paper from the Segal lab:
"Postprandial hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for the development of TIIDM, cardiovascular disease, and liver cirrhosis and is associated with obesity, and enhanced all-cause mortality in both TIIDM and cancer."
In this paper they showed there was individual variation in response to foods, which they related to the microbiome and other features, and showed that dietary changes could improve blood glucose control. This work led to the publication of a fascinating book called The Personalized Diet, whose results can be summarized as "find out which foods spike your blood glucose and don't eat them".
There isn't that much other data out there on blood glucose control in non-diabetics. The other relevant paper I know of is a recent PLoS Biology paper from the Snyder group at Stanford. They also showed significant variation in how non-diabetics responsed to the same foods.
There is also an appealing, intuitive connection of blood glucose to cancer progression and prevention, which rests on the fact that cancer benefits from readily available energy sources in the blood.
I thought it was worth knowing my personal food response profile, so I wore a Dexcom G6 CGM for 30 days.
A Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) is a device that samples your blood glucose continuously. The technology has been around for a few years, but from what I understand, the latest iteration (Dexcom G6) is a pretty big advance over the G5 — mainly in size and accuracy — and is arguably more accurate than competitors like the Freestyle Libre. Dexcom is not a hugely well known company, but it is large (market cap of around $25B at the time of writing.)
The G6 is available by prescription only (I have never heard an explanation for why, but this is partially why we don't have useful preventive data for non-diabetics...) and the cost is approximately $10-20 per day without insurance. The G6 reads out blood glucose in mg/dL every 5 minutes, and transmits directly to an app on your smartphone.
I have done finger prick tests intermittently, and while that's inexpensive and pretty accurate, there are issues: specifically, it hurts and you can't do it often enough to really see granular responses to foods.
Applying the CGM
The process of applying the G6 is very simple, and surprisingly almost entirely painless (less painful than a finger prick). Each "sensor" (the part that samples blood glucose) comes with its own applicator, which inserts the sensor interstitially, surrounded by a large adhesive bandaid. The transmitter (the grey lozenge) then snaps into the sensor, and relays data back to your phone via bluetooth.
The G6 is only approved for use when applied to the abdomen, though many users apply it to the backs of their arms. Since I do not depend on the readings for anything critical, I can be a bit more relaxed about this part, so I stuck it to my arm. Overall, it's very unobtrusive, and with the exception of worrying about getting it wet in the shower, I mostly just forgot it was there.
The G6 integrates with Apple Health, which helps a lot with data wrangling. For some pseudomedical reason the readout is delayed by three hours, but that's not a big deal. To get all my Apple Health data, I can just click the export data button on the Apple Health app, then convert from xml to csv using this handy in-browser converter.
Apple Health also includes data from my Garmin vivosport. The main datatypes here are steps, heart rate, and sleep data.
Get to the graphs
My main questions were: how does my blood glucose change with my diet, sleep, and exercise?
First, what was my average blood glucose over the 30 days? Surprisingly high. A fasting blood glucose reading of above 100 indicates prediabetes. I believe that a really good number would be hovering around 75-85 with food-induced spikes of 100-120. (Note the graph below includes all readings, fasting and non-fasting so it's not as bad as it may seem.)
over the course of the day
Here I show my average blood glucose over the day, and I have marked my estimated sleep and waking times from my Garmin data with grey lines (it's not terribly accurate). By 3am I am usually at a good fasting glucose number (~85) but during the day I have a pretty consistently high number (>100) that depends a lot on the foods I eat, and this can persist past midnight.
There's a clear spike when I wake up. Is that due to circadian rhythms, or morning coffee? These two charts show my glucose by time of day, and by time of first coffee (which varied +/- 45m). The two charts look almost the same, but time of day is a more consistent pattern than minutes after drinking coffee, so I don't think this is a coffee- or breakfast-specific effect.
Foods that spike my blood glucose
Over the 30 days, I took a photo of everthing I ate using an app (BiteSnap). This heatmap that shows when my glucose went high, and it's annotated with the foods I ate from 30 minutes to three hours before. The most intense red is due to an impossible burger (mainly the bun...)
blood glucose trajectories
After eating each food type, what does my blood glucose response look like? Some foods quickly spike (sugary foods like oatmeal with honey), some do not spike at all (fatty foods like chocolate mousse), and others contribute a large amount of blood glucose over time (carby foods like dutch crunch bread). One caveat here is that foods eaten in the evening (e.g., milk chocolate) appear to have lower spikes, but partially this is due to starting at a higher value after dinner. This effect is hard to account for except by manually binning breakfast, lunch, and dinner. The foods are sorted from highest mean increase over four hours to lowest.
Exercise can help drive blood glucose down
There have been a few publications on post-meal exercise and blood glucose. For example, a 2017 study found that exercise at 60% of VO2 max for 50 minutes was effective at driving down blood glucose. This squares with my own observations.
Anecdotally, I observed that being sedentary post-meal (<90bpm) led to a prolonged high-glucose plateau, zone 2 exercise (approximately 110-140pm) led to rapid post-meal glucose reduction — down to just below my typical fasting level after 45 to 60 minutes — and prolonged, higher intensity exercise (>140bpm) led to flat or increased glucose, I assume due to the physical stresses involved.
The charts below show my change in blood glucose over 30 minutes, at a given heart rate, starting at >110 (i.e., post-meal). The second chart shows only the subset of data where my blood glucose is going down; this is because post-meal you will hit 110 twice, on the way up and on the way down, and only the latter is really informative here. Unfortunately, I do not have enough data at higher heart rates to make much of a claim there.
Was this experiment worthwhile?
I didn't find too many unexpected responses to food (carbs are bad; greens, protein and fat are good), though the same food could produce quite different results on different days or different times of day. In a podcast, CGM enthusiast Peter Attia noted that after 3 years of CGM use he was still learning his patterns, and I believe he also recommends his patients collect a minimum of 90 days of CGM data.
Despite all that, this was probably the most useful health intervention I have done. I learned a bunch of actionable things:
my blood glucose is too high for too much of the day. At the very least, it would be good to have glucose levels go down to fasting level at bedtime and stay there all night. Therefore I have tried to stop eating late in the day.
bread triggered an especially bad response for me. It was not surprising that bread is bad, but the magnitude of the effect was. Some bready but fatty foods (butter-heavy deep dish pizza) were tolerated much better, thankfully.
post-meal, zone 1 or especially zone 2 exercise is a good way to modulate glucose levels. I now associate that food coma feeling with a spike of glucose that needs to be corrected with exercise. Even a short, brisk walk seems to help.
as you might expect, some foods, like bread and oatmeal, dropped way down my food pecking order, but less obviously I now know that some "treats" like dark chocolate mousse or almond flour cookies are fine to eat. Finding foods that strike the balance between tasting sweet (unsavory?) without triggering glucose spikes is a fun diversion.
The graphs posted here are the highlights, but I did a bunch of other analyses. The most interesting is a pymc3/numpyro probabilistic model of glucose response that works reasonably well. The main purpose of this model is try to explain each reading by a mixture of contributions from time-of-day, food, etc. I will probably publish this as a separate post.
I plan to do this exercise again in six months or so, to see if my interventions are generating better numbers. In general it's pretty simple, Michael Pollan and the paleo people were right: eat clean unprocessed food, not too much....
ADDENDUM: CGM-approved desserts
Almond flour chocolate chip cookies:
- 6 Tbs. butter, softened
- 2 Tbs. coconut oil
- 1/4 cup brown sugar, packed
- 1 tsp. vanilla extract
- 1 large eggs
- 1/4 tsp. baking soda
- 1/4 tsp. salt
- 1 1/2 cups almond flour
- 1 cup dark chocolate chips (we use Pascha 85%)
Preheat oven to 350°F. Line a baking sheet with parchment paper (or use a Silpat).
In the bowl of a stand mixer, cream together the butter, coconut oil, and brown sugar. Add the vanilla and eggs, mixing until incorporated.
Mix in the baking soda and salt. Add the almond flour, 1 cup at a time, beating well after each addition. Fold in the chocolate chips and walnuts with a wooden spoon.
Form the dough into ~2-3 tablespoon rounds and place on the lined baking sheet about 3 inches apart (~24 cookies). Flatten them a bit with the spatula, they do not flatten very much while baking. Bake for 13 minutes, or until golden brown around edges. Cool and enjoy! Cookies will be fragile until completely cooled.
Almond flour brownies:
- 100 g 85%+ chocolate bar, broken into squares (we use Lindt 90%)
- 8 Tbs. unsalted butter
- 1/4 cup granulated sugar
- 2 large eggs
- 1 teaspoon vanilla extract
- 1/2 teaspoon salt
- 1 cup almond flour
Preheat oven to 350°F. Line an 8×8-inch square baking pan with foil to use as a sling for removing the brownies. Butter the foil or spray it with a nonstick cooking spray.
Melt chocolate and butter together in the microwave in 30-second bursts, stirring between each. When only a couple unmelted bits remain stir to finish melting. Whisk in sugar, then eggs, one at a time, then vanilla and salt. Stir in almond flour with a spoon or flexible spatula. Scrape batter into prepared pan, spread until even. Bake for 25 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted into the center comes out batter-free.
Let cool 5 min in the pan, then lift out gently using the foil. Brownies will be fragile until completely cooled.
Adapted from: https://smittenkitchen.com/2012/08/my-favorite-brownies/
- 3 large ripe bananas
- 1 tsp. vanilla extract
- 1/4 cup coconut oil, melted
- 2 cups rolled oats
- 2/3 cup almond meal
- 2/3 cup coconut (finely shredded & unsweetened)
- 1 tsp. cinnamon
- 1/2 tsp. kosher salt
- 1 tsp. baking powder
- 7 ounces very dark chocolate chips, or a chopped very dark chocolate bar
Preheat oven to 350°F.
Thoroughly mash the bananas in a large bowl. Add the vanilla extract and coconut oil, and stir to combine. Add the oats, almond meal, and shredded coconut, and mix well to fully moisten the dry ingredients. Add the cinnamon, salt, and baking powder, and mix until well combined. Fold in the chocolate chunks/chips.
Drop dollops of the dough, each about 2 teaspoons in size, an inch apart, onto a parchment (or Silpat) lined baking sheet. A cookie scoop works very well for this. Bake for about 20 minutes, until lightly browned.
Adapted from: https://www.101cookbooks.com/healthy-cookie-recipe/
https://chocolatechocolateandmore.com/easy-whipped-dark-chocolate-mousse/ but modified with with 1/3rd the sugar and using (Alter Eco) 85% chocolate.Comment